District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1:26-cv-02594 · 立案 2026-03-09
Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co., Ltd. 诉 Schedule A 卖家
版权侵权Qin Zhuang
立案临时冻结送达长期冻结缺席登记判决/和解
现在意味着什么:案件已有判决或了结记录:未应诉的通常对应缺席判决(冻结资金用于清偿),谈判的对应和解退出。此时以判后救济与执行谈判为主。
案卷时间线(公开记录)
| 2026-07-08 | #17 | Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief |
| 2026-07-06 | #16 | Miscellaneous Relief |
| 2026-04-16 | #11 | Order on Motion for Discovery |
| 2026-03-11 | #9 | order on motion to seal |
| 2026-03-10 | #8 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co., Ltd. for discovery expedited (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 03/10/2026) |
| 2026-03-10 | #7 | SUPPLEMENT to complaint 1 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Joinder (Attachments: # 1 Declaration)(Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 03/10/2026) |
| 2026-03-10 | #6 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co., Ltd. Amended Schedule A regarding complaint 1 (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 03/10/2026) |
| 2026-03-09 | #5 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co., Ltd. to seal Motion to File under Seal (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 03/09/2026) |
| 2026-03-09 | #4 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co., Ltd. Schedule A regarding complaint 1 (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 03/09/2026) |
| 2026-03-09 | #3 | CIVIL Cover Sheet (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 03/09/2026) |
| 2026-03-09 | #2 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co., Ltd. by Qin Zhuang (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 03/09/2026) |
| 2026-03-09 | #1 | COMPLAINT filed by Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co. … 📄 |
| 2026-03-09 | #1 | COMPLAINT filed by Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co. … 📄 |
| 2026-03-09 | #1 | COMPLAINT filed by Hangzhou Yuanzu Technology Co. … |
| 2026-03-09 | #— | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil … |
| 2026-03-09 | #— | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b) … |
| 2026-03-09 | #— | case assigned |
| 2026-03-09 | #— | clerk's notice |
📄 = 该条目有公开 PDF;被告名单类内容已隐去。数据来源:美国联邦法院公开电子记录。
免责声明:本页为公开法庭记录之信息整理,不构成法律意见;状态判定为程序自动生成,以法院文书原文为准。